National Woodwork Manufacturer's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

386 U.S. 612 (1967)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Woodwork Manufacturer’s Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 612 (1967)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Connecticut general contractor Frouge Corporation contracted to build a Philadelphia housing project. Frouge’s collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) with the Carpenters’ International Union required Frouge to follow local union rules and regulations. In Philadelphia, the local union agreement prohibited members from handling “any doors which have been fitted prior to being furnished on the job.” Instead, Philadelphia carpenters traditionally cut and fitted blank doors on the jobsite. The union even refused to hang prefabricated doors with a union label or made by union members elsewhere. Frouge ordered prefitted doors from a manufacturer that belonged to the National Woodwork Manufacturer’s Association (NWMA) (plaintiff), and the carpenters refused to hang them. Frouge withdrew the prefabricated doors and substituted blank doors cut and fit on the jobsite. The NWMA filed unfair-labor-practice charges claiming the no-prefitted-doors rule and making Frouge reject them violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (defendant) dismissed the charges, reasoning that the provision served to protect and preserve work union carpenters did on the jobsite. The Seventh Circuit reversed, and the Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

Dissent (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership