NationsBank of North Carolina v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co.
United States Supreme Court
513 U.S. 251 (1995)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Under the National Bank Act, national banks could exercise all incidental powers necessary to carry on the business of banking. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the comptroller) (defendant) was charged with administration of the National Bank Act. NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A. (NationsBank) (defendant) applied to the comptroller for permission for NationsBank’s brokerage subsidiary to act as an agent in the sale of annuities. An annuity is a contract to make a series of payments to a beneficiary in exchange for payment of a premium. Annuities may be fixed or variable. Annuities have similar features to other types of investments. The comptroller interpreted the National Bank Act to authorize national banks to deal in investment securities as an incidental power to the business of banking. Further, the comptroller determined that annuities were investment securities rather than insurance. Thus, the comptroller approved NationsBank’s plan for its brokerage subsidiary to act as an agent for the sale of annuities. The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC) (plaintiff), a seller of annuities, challenged the comptroller’s decision in the district court. The district court entered judgment for the comptroller and NationsBank. The court of appeals reversed the judgment of the district court, finding that banks outside of small towns were barred from selling insurance under 12 U.S.C. § 92 and that the comptroller’s interpretation that annuities are not insurance was unreasonable. The comptroller and NationsBank appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.