Natkin v. Winfrey

111 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (2000)

From our private database of 46,600+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Natkin v. Winfrey

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
111 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (2000)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Paul Natkin and Stephen Green (plaintiffs) were photographers hired by Harpo (defendant), the production firm of Oprah Winfrey (defendant) to photograph Winfrey on the set of her television show. Both men were professional live-event photographers with separate photography businesses. Both photographers were hired by Harpo without a written agreement. Both photographers worked for the show for about seven years. They had little control over the actual television show, but they exercised great control over their methods, what equipment they purchased and used, and how they conducted their shooting. Harpo did not withhold taxes from the men’s payments and reported the payments as nonemployee compensation on its tax returns. Harpo provided no insurance, paid vacation, or other similar benefits. Natkin and Green, not Harpo, were responsible for hiring substitute photographers if they could not photograph a show. At some point, Winfrey published a book and used 11 of the photographs taken by the two photographers without their permission. Natkin and Green filed a claim for copyright infringement in the district court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Castillo, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,600 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership