Navarette v. California
United States Supreme Court
134 S. Ct. 1683 (2014)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
A person called 9-1-1 reporting that a truck driver was driving dangerously and had just run the person off the road. The person gave the make, model, color, and license plate number of the truck to the State of California (plaintiff) highway patrol. A police officer saw the truck, driven by Lorenzo Navarette (defendant), on the highway and followed it for five minutes before pulling it over. The officer did not note any reckless driving in the time he was following the truck. Upon approaching the truck, the officer smelled marijuana. The officer searched the truck and found 30 pounds of marijuana. Navarette challenged the constitutionality of the traffic stop and incident search. The trial court found the stop and search to be constitutional. The California Court of Appeal affirmed. The California Supreme Court denied review. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.