Near v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Olson
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 697 (1931)
A Minnesota State statute provided for the abatement as a public nuisance of a “malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspaper, magazine or other periodical.” Publishers of such material could also be given a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting distribution, as well as a fine and imprisonment. In 1927, Jay Near (defendant) began publishing “The Saturday Press” which criticized various racial groups and published racial slurs about several Minnesota public officials. One of these officials, Olson (plaintiff), filed suit in state court on the grounds that Near violated the statute by creating a public nuisance. The state trial court entered judgment for Olson and ordered the cessation of Near’s newspaper. The state supreme court affirmed, and Near appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hughes, C.J.)
Dissent (Butler, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 161,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.