Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
638 F.3d 1137 (2011)


Facts

In 2000, Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc. (Systems) (plaintiff) began using the term ActiveBatch in connection with its job-scheduling-and-management software. Systems obtained trademark registration for the ActiveBatch mark in 2001. Network Automation, Inc. (Network) (plaintiff) was a direct competitor of Systems and marketed its own job-scheduling-and-management software to the same customers in the same marketing channels. Google offered a program called Google AdWords that allowed advertisers to purchase key words that, when entered into Google’s search engine, would return links to the advertisers’ products and services. Network purchased the keyword ActiveBatch so that sponsored results for Network’s service would be returned when web users searched for the term. In 2009, Systems sent Network cease-and-desist letters, requesting that Network stop using Systems’s trademark in commerce, and ultimately threatened litigation for trademark infringement. Network responded by filing a suit seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement, and Systems counterclaimed for trademark infringement and a preliminary injunction. A preliminary injunction was granted by the district court, which held that a likelihood of consumer confusion existed and that Systems had a strong chance of succeeding on a claim of trademark infringement. Network appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wardlaw, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.