From our private database of 35,800+ case briefs...
New Mexico Cattle Growers Association v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
248 F.3d 1277 (2001)
In 1995, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (defendant) issued a final rule that listed the southwestern willow flycatcher (flycatcher), a small bird that nests in riparian riverbeds, as endangered. The FWS did not move forward with issuing a critical habitat designation (CHD) for the flycatcher until directed by district court in 1997. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) required the FWS to perform an economic analysis of the CHD before making a final designation. To determine economic impact, the FWS adopted an incremental baseline approach (the baseline approach) based on the idea that a species is listed before or simultaneously with a CHD and the listing will have economic impacts that were not to be considered for the CHD’s economic-impact analysis. The baseline approach thus takes any economic impact caused as a result of the listing and moves it below the baseline. When making a CHD, only the economic impacts that rose above the baseline were considered. The FWS took the position that the impacts of a listing and CHD were co-extensive and that a CHD did not create any material effects or impacts. Thus, the FWS used the baseline approach to determine that the flycatcher CHD would result in no additional economic effects beyond those caused by listing and thus would have no economic effect. New Mexico Cattle Growers Association (Cattle Growers) (plaintiff) filed suit in district court, arguing that the FWS’s adoption of the baseline approach to measuring the economic impact of the CHD was an erroneous construction and violation of the ESA. The district court dismissed Cattle Grower’s complaint, and Cattle Growers appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Tacha, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.