Newport News Holdings Corp. v. Virtual City Vision, Inc.

650 F.3d 423 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Newport News Holdings Corp. v. Virtual City Vision, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
650 F.3d 423 (2011)

Facts

Newport News Holding Corp. (plaintiff) was a women’s clothing and accessories company that held multiple trademarks for the mark “Newport News” including for the domain name “newport-news.com.” Newport News had attempted to also acquire the rights to the domain name “newportnews.com” but that name was owned by Virtual City Vision, Inc., (VCV) a corporation owned and operated by Van James Bond Tran (defendants). Tran was the president and sole employee of VCV, which owned a number of domain names that incorporated the names of geographical locations and operated as websites providing local information for those places. Newport News eventually offered to buy the domain name from VCV, but VCV responded that it would only consider a “seven-figure” amount or in the alternative that it would sell Newport News’s products on the site for a commission. After this, the site shifted away from providing local information for the Newport News geographical area, in contrast to the company’s other location-based websites, and began primarily offering advertisements for other brands of women’s clothing. Newport News sued VCV and Tran under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). The district court found that VCV had acted in bad faith in violation of the ACPA and granted summary judgment to Newport News. VCV appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duncan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership