Nichols v. Tri-National Logistics, Inc.

809 F.3d 981 (2016)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nichols v. Tri-National Logistics, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
809 F.3d 981 (2016)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Rebecca Nichols (plaintiff) worked as a semitruck driver for Tri-National Logistics, Incorporated and RMR Driver Services, jointly referred to as TNI (TNI) (defendants). Nichols was assigned James Paris as a driving partner because she was not allowed to drive alone due to past damage-causing incidents. Paris propositioned Nichols to enter a romantic relationship on their first trip. Nichols declined. She did not report the proposition to TNI. Nichols and Paris were scheduled to drive together on a multi-day trip. Paris frequently exposed himself to Nichols from the back of the cab while she was driving. His actions upset her, and she told him not to act like that. Nichols alleged that she immediately reported Paris’s misconduct to Melissa Foust, a safety-department employee. Nichols reported Paris’s sexual harassment to Foust five times during the six-day trip. She also reported Paris’s conduct to Bob Oliver, a TNI dispatcher. Oliver suggested Nichols endure the harassment until the trip was complete. When the trip ended, Nichols and Paris were subject to a mandatory 34-hour rest period. Nichols went with Paris to his home in Pharr, Texas, because no other drivers were available until after the rest period. Nichols requested permission to take the truck to another location. She was denied. Nichols slept in the truck that night. Nichols asked Paris to take her to a motel the next day. Paris asked her for sex and offered to forgive a debt that she owed him. Nichols refused. Paris became mad, verbally abusive, and took Nichols’s keys and cell phone. Paris eventually took Nichols to a motel that night. Paris drove Nichols to meet with another truck driver the next day. Nichols reported to TNI that Paris’s conduct made her feel abused, scared, and degraded. A psychiatrist diagnosed Nichols with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder caused by Paris’s harassment. TNI terminated Nichols several weeks after the trip with Paris, citing safety violations reported by her new driving partner. Nichols filed suit against TNI, claiming sex discrimination and retaliatory termination. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of TNI. Nichols appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

Dissent (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership