Nichols v. Union Underwear Co.
Supreme Court of Kentucky
602 S.W.2d 429 (1980)
Richard Nichols (plaintiff) was playing with matches when his T-shirt caught on fire, causing him injury. The shirt was manufactured by Union Underwear Company, Inc. (Union) (defendant). The shirt was in compliance with all federal flammability standards. Nichols brought a strict-liability design-defect suit against Union. The trial court instructed the jury on the consumer-expectation test, under which a product is deemed defective if its condition at the time the product leaves the hands of the seller is not contemplated by an ordinary consumer of the product and is unreasonably dangerous to the consumer. The jury returned a verdict for Union. The court of appeals affirmed. Nichols appealed, arguing that the jury instruction was improper.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stephens, J.)
Concurrence (Lukowsky, J.)
Dissent (Stephenson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.