Norman v. Ogallala Public School District

259 Neb. 184, 609 N.W.2d 338 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Norman v. Ogallala Public School District

Nebraska Supreme Court
259 Neb. 184, 609 N.W.2d 338 (2000)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Christopher Norman (plaintiff) was a student in a welding class at Ogallala High School (school) (defendant) taught by Willis Hastings. The class included instruction on welding techniques, and the enrolled students were beginners with no demonstrated proficiency in the field. The school provided some protective gear for students, including goggles, helmets, leather gloves, and leather leggings but did not require the students to use the items. The school did not provide protective leather aprons. Hastings told the students to wear protective clothing and gave them a handout that referenced leather clothing or clothing made from heavy, chemically treated cloth as options. However, Hastings allowed students to choose their own attire and suggested that the students bring an old shirt from home. Students were not prevented from welding regardless of attire, and parents received no information on protective clothing. In class, Norman was wearing an untreated flannel button-down shirt over an untreated T-shirt, both of which caught fire. Norman suffered severe burns to the left side of his body. Norman and his family brought a negligence action in a Nebraska trial court against the Ogallala Public School District, the school, and Hastings (defendants). Expert witnesses testified that industry standards recommended that cotton clothing be chemically treated before use as protective clothing. Experts further testified that standards required durable, flame-resistant aprons to be used by welders. The evidence presented also showed that a leather apron or proper shirt material would have prevented Norman’s burns. The trial court found the school negligent in allowing students to wear improper attire, failing to enforce protective gear, failing to provide parents with proper information about protective clothing, and failing to provide leather aprons for class. The school appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hendry, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership