Novak v. Continental Tire of North America
California Court of Appeal
22 Cal. App. 5th 189 (2018)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
Paula Novak (plaintiff) filed a wrongful-death action against Continental Tire of North America (Continental) (defendant), a tire manufacturer, and Chi Tai (defendant), a vehicle mechanic, for the death of her father, Alex Novak. In 2005, 81-year-old Alex was a passenger in a car driven by Milagros Ibarra, which had an accident when a tire blew out. Six years later, in 2011, Alex died eight days after being hit by a car, whose driver, Mea MD Abdul Quader, failed to yield while Alex was in the crosswalk on his scooter, causing spinal fractures and hemorrhaging. Paula’s theory for why Continental and Tai were responsible for her father’s death was as follows: Continental’s and Tai’s failure to warn Ibarra that the rubber in older tires degrades caused the sudden tire failure in 2005; the tire failure caused the accident; the accident caused Alex to become disabled; the disability caused Alex to utilize a scooter; utilizing a scooter made Alex less able to maneuver than a pedestrian; Alex’s lessened ability to maneuver caused the accident in 2011 between Alex’s scooter and Quader’s vehicle; and the accident caused Alex’s death. Continental and Tai moved for summary judgment, which a trial court granted, finding that there was no causal link between Continental’s and Tai’s conduct, which Paula asserted had caused the tire failure in 2005, and Alex’s death, six years later, eight days after a different traffic accident. Paula appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pollak, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.