Odièvre v. France
European Court of Human Rights
2003-III Eur. Ct. H.R. 51 (2003)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
In France, birth mothers had the right to anonymous birth, which included the right to give birth and relinquish custody of their children in anonymity. The French government (defendant) did not recognize the right of a child to know her birth mother’s identity if the birth mother did not consent. The European Convention on Human Rights (the convention), also known as the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, contained a provision, Article 8, that (1) recognized that everyone had the right to respect for his or her family life and (2) prohibited public authorities from interfering with that right unless the interference was in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society. Odièvre (plaintiff) was an adult adoptee whose birth mother chose anonymous birth and did not wish to have contact with Odièvre. The French government provided some non-identifying information to Odièvre about her birth family, and the government was in the process of establishing an agency that would maintain birth parents’ anonymity while providing a mechanism for adoptees to ask their birth parents to consent to the disclosure of their identities. Odièvre filed an application in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), arguing that the French government violated her Article 8 right by refusing to disclose the identity of her birth mother. A panel of the ECtHR considered whether the convention guaranteed Odièvre’s right to know the identity of her birth mother without her birth mother’s consent.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.