Ohio v. U.S. Dep’t of the Interior
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
880 F.2d 432 (1989)
- Written by Peggy Chen, JD
Facts
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) established the Superfund to expedite cleanup of sites with hazardous contamination of natural resources, while imposing the costs on those responsible. Six years later, the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) (defendant) promulgated regulations governing damages assessment. Ten states, several environmental organizations, industrial corporations, and an industry group (plaintiffs) promptly challenged the regulations. The states and environmental groups argued that the lesser-of rule would undervalue harm to natural resources, allowing damages insufficient to pay restoration or replacement costs. Meanwhile, the private organizations argued that the rule would encourage excessive damages. Then Congress enacted the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), requiring DOI to amend its regulations to conform. The courts consolidated a second lawsuit challenging the amended regulations and proceeded to the Circuit Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wald, C.J.; Robinson, J.; and Mitka, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
