Osterlind v. Hill
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
160 N.E. 301 (1928)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Albert Osterlind and a companion, Ryan, rented a canoe from Harold Hill (defendant), a commercial lessor of boats. Osterlind and Ryan were intoxicated. Their canoe capsized. Osterlind clung to the canoe for half an hour, calling for help. Hill apparently heard the calls but did not respond. Osterlind eventually let go of the canoe and drowned. The administrator of his estate (plaintiff) sued Hill, alleging that Hill’s conduct was willful, wanton, reckless, or negligent and that such conduct caused Osterlind to suffocate and drown. The trial court sustained Hill’s demurrer to the complaint. The administrator of Osterlind’s estate appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Braley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.