Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Ottawa Silica Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
699 F.2d 1124 (Fed. Cir. 1983)


Facts

Ottawa Silica Company (Ottawa) (plaintiff) owned a large property that could not be used for its primary business of mining silica. Ottawa wanted to sell the property to real-estate developers to be turned into a planned residential development. The local school district, Oceanside-Carlsbad Union High School District (Oceanside), identified a portion of Ottawa’s property as an ideal location for a new high school. Oceanside, a tax-exempt organization, asked Ottawa to charitably donate the parcel to Oceanside. Ottawa transferred the parcel to Oceanside and negotiated locations for Oceanside to create access roads to the high school. The value of Ottawa’s remaining property increased significantly because of the new high school and access roads built by Oceanside. Ottawa sold most of its remaining property to developers. On its federal taxes, Ottawa claimed a charitable-gift tax deduction in an amount equal to the value of the land transferred to Oceanside. The federal tax commissioner determined that Ottawa had received a substantial benefit in exchange for the transferred property, and denied Ottawa’s claim for a charitable tax deduction. Ottawa filed suit against the United States government (government) (defendant) in the United States Court of Claims for a refund. The court of claims entered judgment in favor of the government. Ottawa appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed. Ottawa appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.