Otto v. City of Boca Raton, Florida
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
981 F.3d 854 (2021)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
The City of Boca Raton, Florida (Boca Raton) (defendant) passed an ordinance prohibiting therapists from engaging in sexual-orientation-change efforts (SOCE), also called conversion therapy, which was designed to alter a patient’s sexual orientation or gender identity. The ordinance applied only to minors and explicitly covered talk-only SOCE. The ordinance did not bar therapists from providing supportive therapy to transgender patients undergoing a gender-transitioning process. Robert Otto (plaintiff), a licensed therapist who regularly employed SOCE in his practice, sued Boca Raton and moved for a preliminary injunction, arguing that the ordinance was an impermissible content-based restriction and violated his First Amendment rights. Boca Raton countered, arguing that the ordinance was permissible because (1) it was intended to protect minors from the harmful effects of SOCE and (2) it targeted speech that was incidental to professional conduct or that could be reclassified as professional conduct, meaning that the ordinance invoked less stringent First Amendment protection than ordinances targeting regular speech. Boca Raton submitted numerous reports from national and international medical organizations, all of which stated that SOCE placed minors at significant risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide. However, no recent, rigorous, prospective SOCE research was provided. The district court denied Otto’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Otto appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Grant, J.)
Dissent (Martin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.