Otto v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
814 F.2d 1127 (1986)
- Written by Eric Maddox, JD
Facts
Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC) (defendant) sold fixed annuities with an interest rate of 4 percent per year for 10 years followed by a rate of 3.5 percent after 10 years. The funds were held in a separate account to be invested in mortgages and bonds. Any excess interest was to be paid at VALIC’s discretion. Beverly Otto (plaintiff) purchased a fixed annuity from VALIC in 1975 and initiated a class action in 1982 due to VALIC’s failure to disclose how excess interest would be calculated. In particular, VALIC did not disclose whether excess interest was calculated using the banding method or the new-money method. Otto also claimed that VALIC failed to disclose the method used to maximize the rate of return. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of VALIC, and Otto appealed. The court of appeals affirmed but subsequently granted Otto’s petition for a rehearing. At rehearing, VALIC asserted that it had the right to freely alter past interest bonds.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.