From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...
Outdoor Technologies, Inc. v. Allfirst Financial, Inc.
Delaware Superior Court
44 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 801 (2001)
Hechinger, Inc. (Hechinger) issued a check to Outdoor Technologies, Inc. (Outdoor) (plaintiff). The check was drawn on Hechinger’s account at First Omni Bank (Omni) (defendant), but incorrectly designated First National Bank of Maryland (FNB) (defendant) as the location of the account. Outdoor learned that Hechinger was readying to file for bankruptcy. Consequently, instead of initiating the slower process of depositing the check into Outdoor’s corporate account, Outdoor’s controller, John Hurt, went to FNB to more quickly obtain payment. Hurt was notified that FNB could not negotiate the check because it was drawn on an Omni account. Hurt then traveled to Maryland Bancorp (Bancorp) (defendant), which owned Omni. William Thomas, a corporate attorney, told Hurt that Omni would negotiate the check only if Hechinger had sufficient finds in the account and had not yet filed for bankruptcy, and if Hurt presented the check along with “proper authorization” to negotiate in person. Hurt did not ask, and Thomas did not explain, what constituted proper authorization. Hurt later arrived at Omni and presented the check and a letter signed by Outdoor’s president stating that Hurt was authorized to negotiate the check. Omni told Hurt that proper authorization must be in the form of a resolution from Outdoor’s board of directors. Because acquiring a board resolution would take too long, Hurt deposited the check into Outdoor’s corporate account. However, before Omni could pay, Hechinger filed for bankruptcy, preventing all payment from his accounts. Outdoor filed suit against Omni, FNB, and Bancorp, alleging fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The defendants moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.