Pacific Metal Co. v. Joslin

359 F.2d 396 (1966)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pacific Metal Co. v. Joslin

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
359 F.2d 396 (1966)

  • Written by Sheryl McGrath, JD

Facts

Pacific Metal Company (Pacific) (plaintiff) was an Oregon corporation. Pacific sold machinery to Edsco Manufacturing Company (Edsco), a business in the state of Washington. The sale contract allowed Pacific to repossess the machinery if Edsco failed to pay for the machinery and allowed Pacific to obtain a deficiency judgment against Edsco for the balance due. Pacific recorded the contract as a conditional sale contract in the state of Washington. Both Pacific and Edsco thought the contract was a valid contract of conditional sale under Washington law. After receiving and using the machinery, Edsco declared bankruptcy. The trustee in bankruptcy was Fairell Joslin (defendant). In the bankruptcy action, Joslin contended that the contract between Pacific and Edsco was void and unenforceable as against Edsco’s other creditors. The district court (acting as a bankruptcy court) accepted Joslin’s contention and ruled that the sale contract was void as against Edsco’s other creditors. Pacific appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duniway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership