Park Shuttle N Fly v. Norfolk Airport Authority
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
352 F. Supp. 2d 688 (2004)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The Norfolk Airport Authority (authority) (defendant) owned and operated the Norfolk International Airport (airport) (defendant). The airport needed to raise additional revenue to meet a legal requirement that the airport be self-sustaining. The airport had its own parking facilities with excess capacity and did not receive any benefit from off-airport parking companies. The single existing off-airport parking company, Park Shuttle N Fly, Inc. (Park Shuttle) (plaintiff), competed with the airport and received over 90 percent of its revenue from airport customers. The authority researched fees that other airports were charging to off-airport parking companies and hired an airport-management consultant to do the same. The authority then started charging off-airport parking companies a fee of 8 percent of the company’s gross revenues for the privilege of accessing the airport to pick up and drop off customers. Other courtesy vehicles, such as taxis and hotel shuttles, had different fee arrangements with the airport that were generally lower. Park Shuttle sued the authority, arguing that the privilege fee violated the Due Process, Equal Protection, and Commerce Clauses of the United States Constitution. The district court dismissed the Due Process claim and held a bench trial on the Equal Protection and Commerce Clauses claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.