Parker v. Columbia Bank
Maryland Court of Special Appeals
91 Md. App. 346 (1992)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Robert and Margaret Parker (plaintiffs) contracted with builder George Evangelos Paleologos for the construction of a house. The Parkers entered into a construction-loan agreement with Columbia Bank (the bank) (defendant). Throughout the course of construction, the bank received numerous calls from contractors working on the house but did not disburse funds to the contractors or supervise the construction. Paleologos later opened an account with the bank but had insufficient funds, so the bank granted him a line of credit. The Parkers later received a supplier’s notice of intent to file a lien. The Parkers asked the bank about the lien, and the bank said it knew nothing of the lien. The Parkers subsequently brought suit against the bank, alleging fraudulent concealment, negligent misrepresentation, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty. The circuit court dismissed these claims, and the Parkers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Motz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.