From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Pavel Enterprises, Inc. v. A. S. Johnson Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
342 Md. 143, 674 A.2d 521 (1996)
The National Institute of Health (NIH) solicited bids from general contractors for work on a planned construction project. In response, Pavel Enterprises Incorporated (Pavel) (plaintiff), a general contractor, began preparing a bid for the project by soliciting its own bids from a number of subcontractors. A.S. Johnson Company (Johnson) (defendant) submitted the lowest subcontractor bid, which Pavel used in calculating a bid for submission to NIH. Pavel submitted only the second lowest bid and was not immediately awarded the contract. Ultimately, however, NIH awarded the contract to Pavel, and Pavel informed Johnson that Johnson had been selected as the subcontractor for the project. Johnson, however, replied that its bid had contained an error, and that as a result the bid was too low. Accordingly, Johnson sought to withdraw its bid. Pavel refused to consent to Johnson’s withdrawal and ultimately was forced to accept the bid of another subcontractor. The substitute contractor’s price was $32,000 higher than Johnson’s bid, and Pavel brought suit to recover this difference. The trial court, analyzing the facts under both traditional contract principles and a theory of detrimental reliance, found that no contract had been formed, nor enforceable promise made. Pavel appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Karwacki, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.