Peloza v. Capistrano Unified School District

37 F.3d 517 (1994)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Peloza v. Capistrano Unified School District

United Sates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
37 F.3d 517 (1994)

Facts

John Peloza (plaintiff) was a high school biology teacher in the public-school system in California. Peloza sued the Capistrano Unified School District (the school district) (defendant) alleging that the school district had violated his constitutional rights by requiring him to teach the theory of evolution to his students. Peloza did not believe that evolution was a valid scientific theory. Instead, he claimed that “evolutionism” was a religious or philosophical belief based on the assumption that life and the universe had evolved randomly without a creator. Peloza also alleged that he had been forbidden to discuss religious matters with students while on the school campus, even if the conversation was initiated by a student and took place outside of class time. Peloza asked the court for a declaratory judgment permitting him to respond to student-initiated inquiries about religion during school time. The district court dismissed Peloza’s claims for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Peloza appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Concurrence/Dissent (Poole, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership