From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
People v. Bierenbaum
New York Supreme Court
301 A.D.2d 119 (2002)
Robert Bierenbaum (Robert) (defendant) was charged with the second-degree murder of Gail Katz Bierenbaum (Gail). At trial, the State of New York (plaintiff) introduced circumstantial evidence to support the theory that after Gail requested a divorce, Robert killed Gail, piloted a plane over the Atlantic Ocean, and discarded her remains. The state presented evidence that Robert was the last one who saw Gail alive, made several inconsistent statements, and omitted the fact that he had rented a plane on the day of her disappearance. The state introduced testimony from one of Robert’s psychiatrists who had sent a Tarasoff letter to Gail, warning her that Robert was dangerous. The state also introduced witnesses who testified that Gail was afraid of Robert because he frequently threatened her and had choked her unconscious. The witnesses also testified that Gail was prepared to divorce Robert and expose the Tarasoff letter if he failed to agree to her divorce demands. Following the trial, Robert was convicted. Robert appealed on evidentiary grounds. Robert argued that the witnesses’ testimony about his prior violence should not have been admitted into evidence. Additionally, Robert argued that (1) the guilty verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence, (2) allowing the psychiatrist to testify about the Tarasoff letter was unfairly prejudicial, and (3) allowing the witnesses’ testimony about Gail’s intent to use the Tarasoff letter and about the choking incident constituted inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marlow, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.