People v. Brackett
Illinois Supreme Court
510 N.E.2d 877 (1987)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Randy Brackett (defendant) severely beat, choked, and raped 85-year-old widow Elizabeth Winslow. She died five weeks later. Twenty-one-year-old Brackett used only his bare hands, but at six-foot-three, he broke bones. After three weeks in the hospital, Winslow’s prognosis remained poor. Winslow had been a feisty, independent woman, but she became depressed, resisted eating, and progressively weakened. Her doctor attributed her poor prognosis to how trauma and removal from home for hospitalization often affect elderly people. Her doctor concluded she was too weak to swallow, transferred her to a nursing home, and ordered a nasal-gastric tube, but her injuries made inserting it impossible. Winslow became cyanotic, and her doctor summoned her family. After a nurse’s aide fed her small amounts of pureed food for 20 minutes, Winslow died of asphyxiation. The autopsy doctor explained Winslow aspirated food because the pain associated with her broken rib kept her from inhaling enough air to clear her trachea. The prosecution (plaintiff) charged Brackett with felony murder. The judge convicted, specifically finding that Brackett was a contributing cause of Winslow’s death, and the appellate court affirmed. Brackett again appealed, arguing he did not cause Winslow’s death from asphyxiation, lacked intent to kill, and did not know or foresee that beating someone with bare fists could cause death.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.