People v. Direct Revenue, LLC
New York Supreme Court
19 Misc. 3d 1124 (2008)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Direct Revenue, LLC (defendant) produced software known as an “advertising client” that generated pop-up advertisements based on a consumer’s Internet usage. Direct Revenue offered free software, such as screensavers and games; if a consumer downloaded the free software, the advertising client would also be installed on the consumer’s computer. Consumers complained that the advertising client was being installed on their computers without their consent. The New York attorney general (NYAG) (plaintiff) tested 29 websites that distributed Direct Revenue’s advertising client and conducted seven tests directly with Direct Revenue. In each of the seven tests, the investigator was presented with a hyperlink and given the option of accepting or declining an end-user license agreement (EULA). The EULA stated that the software would collect information about websites accessed by the consumer and use that information to display advertising on the consumer’s computer. Six investigators clicked “yes” to accept the EULA and downloaded the free software. No software was installed on the computer of the investigator who clicked “no.” Two of the tests were preceded by an advertisement offering “free” software. The NYAG sued Direct Revenue for an injunction and monetary relief, alleging deceptive practices, trespass to chattel, computer tampering, and false advertising based on the investigators’ tests and millions of other transactions throughout the world. Direct Revenue moved to dismiss the petition.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cahn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.