Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

People v. Hodges

Superior Court of California, Appellate Department
13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 412 (1992)


Facts

Christine G., a 17-year-old student of the South Bay Christian Academy, informed a teacher that her stepfather had been molesting her for years. The teacher arranged a meeting between Christine and Mr. Hodges (defendant), the school president and pastor of the church that operated the school. After Christine told Hodges of the abuse, he told her not to tell anyone and that he would take care of the situation. Mr. Nobbs (defendant), the school principal and assistant pastor, also got involved. Hodges met with the stepfather and had him write a letter of apology to Christine. The stepfather was also to apologize in front of the congregation. After Christine received the letter, Hodges had a meeting with her and her parents, against Christine’s objection. Hodges told Christine to go home with her parents, which she did not want to do out of fear of her stepfather. Christine ran away rather than return home. When she went to school, Hodges told her that she would not be allowed back at school or to graduate unless she went home. Neither Hodges nor Nobbs ever reported the abuse to authorities. The state of California (plaintiff) charged Hodges and Nobbs with violating state law requiring “child care custodian[s]” to report known or suspected incidents of child abuse. Hodges and Nobbs were convicted. They appealed, contending that they were not “child care custodian[s]” and that the law was unconstitutional as applied to them.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Moon, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.