Perry v. Shaw

88 Cal. App. 4th 658, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 7 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Perry v. Shaw

California Court of Appeals
88 Cal. App. 4th 658, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 7 (2001)

Facts

Sandra Perry (plaintiff) went to Dr. William Shaw (defendant) to discuss surgery to remove excess skin from Perry’s arms, back, thighs, and stomach, following Perry’s substantial weight loss. During a number of office visits, Perry and Shaw discussed the option of Shaw performing breast enlargement and breast-lifting procedures as part of the planned surgery. Perry told Shaw that she had decided she definitely did not want to have any breast surgery at that time. When Perry went to the hospital for the surgery, she was presented with a form that asked for consent for the breast-lifting procedure. Perry twice refused to sign. However, after Perry was medicated and taken to the operating room and assured by Shaw that he would not perform breast surgery, Perry signed the consent form. When Perry awoke from the surgery, she discovered that in addition to the skin removal procure, Shaw had enlarged her breasts by moving tissue flaps from the sides of her chest into her breasts. Perry was dismayed, and when she asked Shaw about the breast enlargement, Shaw told her that though she might be upset now, she would be happy in a year after further surgeries for minor revisions. Perry sued Shaw, and the jury sided with Perry, finding that Shaw had committed medical negligence and battery, and awarded Perry $59,000 in medical expenses and $1,030,000 for noneconomic damages. Shaw motioned to reduce the noneconomic damages award to $250,000 on the basis of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act. The judge denied the motion, and Shaw appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vogel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership