Picard v. Barry Pontiac‑Buick, Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
436 A.2d 690 (1995)
In response to a dispute over repairs, Picard (plaintiff) brought a camera to the repair shop of her automobile dealer, Barry Pontiac‑Buick, Inc. (defendant), and took a picture of one of the dealer’s employees (defendant). The employee admitted pointing his finger at Picard, approaching Picard, asking who gave her permission to take his picture, and placing his index finger on the camera that was in Picard’s hand. Picard brought claims for assault and battery. She was awarded substantial compensatory damages and punitive damages. Pontiac‑Buick and its employee appeal, arguing that Picard failed to prove assault or battery because Picard was not placed in reasonable fear of imminent bodily harm, and because there was no evidence that the employee intended to touch Picard.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lederberg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.