Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Player v. Thompson

193 S.E.2d 531 (1972)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Player v. Thompson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

193 S.E.2d 531 (1972)

Facts

Nancy Carder (codefendant) borrowed a car from Geraldine Thompson (codefendant). Diane Player (plaintiff), a passenger in the car, was injured when the car skidded on wet pavement. Player sued Carder and Thompson, alleging both knew or should have known the car's tires were bald. According to Carder's pretrial statement, a few weeks before the accident she and Thompson took the car for state inspection. Carder heard the inspector tell Thompson, and Thompson told Carder, that the car failed inspection because it needed new tires. Player conceded this statement was not relevant as to Thompson. Player therefore proffered the statement stripped of any reference to Thompson, and only as it related to Carder. The trial judge excluded the statement because, among other things, it was hearsay that prejudiced Thompson. Player also sought permission to question Carder about the state inspection incident, to show that both Carder and Thompson had notice of the bald tires. Once again, the judge ruled this would be inadmissible hearsay. The trial ended in nonsuit. Player appealed to the Supreme Court of South Carolina, arguing the judge erred in his hearsay rulings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership