Plumstead Theatre Society, Inc. v. Commissioner

74 T.C. 1324 (1980)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Plumstead Theatre Society, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
74 T.C. 1324 (1980)

Facts

Plumstead Theatre Society, Inc. (Plumstead) (plaintiff) was founded as a nonprofit organization in California. Under its articles of incorporation, Plumstead was organized with the purpose of cultivating and advancing the arts, primarily theater, by commissioning new and original works, among other activities. The articles of incorporation provided that Plumstead would not operate for financial gain, and its earnings would not go to the benefit of any private individual. In 1977, Plumstead contracted with another nonprofit theater to jointly sponsor a season of three plays in Pasadena, California, with the aim of bringing the arts to an area that lacked a community theater. Also in 1977, Plumstead contracted with the nonprofit Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., to jointly produce an original play called First Monday in October (First Monday), with each organization providing half the capitalization costs at the outset. Plumstead could not meet its obligation, so it raised money by selling a portion of its rights in First Monday to private investors in exchange for a share of the profits or losses from the play. The production was advertised, tickets were sold, and professionals were cast. The play opened in December 1977 and ran through February 1978. First Monday was the only play Plumstead had actually produced at the time when the commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) determined that Plumstead did not qualify for tax-exempt status under Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3). Plumstead petitioned the tax court for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilbur, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership