Plumtree Software, Inc. v. Datamize, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
473 F.3d 1152 (2006)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
On February 27, 1996, Kevin Burns, owner of Datamize, LLC (Datamize) (defendant), applied for patents for a computer program authoring tool and software. The patents were eventually issued. Burns had completed development of the authoring tool in December 1994, at which time Burns’ company, Multimedia Adventures (MA), discovered that the Ski Industry of America (SIA) was holding a tradeshow in March 1995. On January 17, 1995, MA representatives gave a presentation about the authoring tool to SIA. On January 25, 1995, SIA sent MA a letter memorializing the parties’ agreement that, in exchange for a waived sponsorship fee and floor space at the tradeshow, MA would provide the software package necessary to produce a touch-screen information kiosk. Plumtree Software, Inc. (Plumtree) (plaintiff) filed a declaratory judgment action against Datamize, contending that the patents were invalid under the 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) on sale bar. The district court granted Plumtree’s motion for summary judgment, and Datamize appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dyk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.