Poindexter v. Illinois
Illinois Supreme Court
890 N.E.2d 410 (2008)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Robert Poindexter, Mirl Whitaker, Maurice Hardy, Virginia McCulley, and Roger Meredith (the community spouses) (plaintiffs) each had a spouse who was institutionalized in a nursing home and receiving Medicaid benefits. After the institutionalized spouses received their benefits, Illinois (defendant) sought to recover the nursing-home costs from the respective community spouses pursuant to Illinois’s spousal-support laws. The community spouses sued Illinois, seeking a declaration that the state’s spousal-support laws conflicted with the federal Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act (MCCA) and were thus preempted. Illinois argued that the supposedly conflicting provision in the MCCA related only to determining a person’s eligibility for Medicaid benefits and did not govern a state’s right to recover the costs of those benefits from financially able community spouses. The trial court held in the community spouses’ favor, but the appellate court reversed. The community spouses appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fitzgerald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

