Prosecutor v. Jelisić
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
Case No. IT-95-10-A (2001)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Serbian forces imprisoned Brčko’s Muslim leaders and community in detention camps. Goran Jelisić (defendant) commanded one camp, regularly ordering the executions and abuse of Muslim prisoners. The prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia charged Jelisić with 32 war crimes and crimes against humanity, including genocide. Jelisić pleaded guilty to all the charges except genocide. After the prosecution presented its case at trial, the trial chamber dismissed the genocide charge, finding the evidence could not support a finding that Jelisić had the necessary state of mind—specific intent to eliminate an entire group. The trial chamber acknowledged that Jelisić had threatened to sterilize Muslims to prevent their continued existence, threatened to kill all Muslims, warned the prisoners that only 5 to 10 percent of them would survive the camp, and boasted about his daily killing quota. However, the trial chamber also found that Jelisić was mentally disturbed, sometimes selected prisoners arbitrarily, and had released some Muslims. The trial chamber found that Jelisić was likely a murderer who hated and persecuted Muslims but that the trial evidence presented was not consistent with wanting every single Brčko Muslim dead and therefore could not support a finding that he had specifically intended to commit genocide. Jelisić was sentenced to 40 years for the other crimes. The prosecutor appealed the genocide charge’s dismissal, contending that the trial chamber had failed to adequately consider all the evidence. For example, testimony indicated that Jelisić referred to his plans and desires to exterminate all Muslims in the area on a repeated basis, not just occasionally, and that he frequently executed based on ordered lists. Evidence also showed that the camp’s executions occurred with regularity. The prosecutor argued that this evidence, taken as a whole, showed that Jelisić both was mentally disturbed and had specific genocidal intent. The appeal chamber reviewed the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.



