Pruitt v. General Motors Corp.
California Court of Appeal
72 Cal. App. 4th 1480 (1999)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Norma Pruitt (plaintiff) was driving a car manufactured by General Motors Corp. (GMC) (defendant) with her seatbelt and shoulder harness fastened. As Pruitt turned left at an intersection, her car collided with an oncoming car. The airbag on Pruitt’s side of the car deployed upon impact, fracturing Pruitt’s lower jaw in three places. Pruitt brought a products-liability action against GMC, alleging that the airbag should not have deployed in a low-speed collision. The court declined to instruct the jury, as Pruitt requested, that a product is defective in design if it fails to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect when used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable manner. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of GMC. Pruitt appealed, arguing that the court should have given a jury instruction on the consumer-expectations test.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilbert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
