Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
553 U.S. 617 (2004)


Facts

LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE) (plaintiff) owned a group of computer patents that it licensed to Intel Corporation (Intel). LGE’s licensing agreement with Intel allowed Intel to manufacture and sell computer parts using LGE’s patents. This agreement also specifically stated that the license did not extend to third parties using Intel’s parts. In a related agreement, Intel further agreed to notify its customers that Intel’s licensing agreement with LGE would not extend to products made by customers using Intel components. Quanta Computer, Inc. and other computer manufacturers (defendants) purchased Intel computing components that had to be combined with certain standard parts to create a complete computing system. The defendants then combined those components with non-Intel components in the defendants’ own computer systems. The defendants’ combination of Intel and non-Intel components followed the specifications, or method, described in LGE’s patents. LGE sued the defendants for patent infringement. The defendants moved for summary judgment. The district court held that the doctrine of patent exhaustion gives purchasers the right to use or resell patented articles without infringing, and, therefore, the doctrine of patent exhaustion defeated LGE’s claim that these valid purchasers had infringed on LGE’s patents. However, the district court limited its patent-exhaustion holding to apparatus claims within LGE’s patents, holding that patent exhaustion did not apply to method claims. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s holding that patent exhaustion did not apply to method claims. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.