Ralph's Grocery Co.

108 Lab. Arb. Rep. 718 (1997)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ralph’s Grocery Co.

Labor Arbitration
108 Lab. Arb. Rep. 718 (1997)

Facts

An employee of Ralph’s Grocery Company (Ralph’s) (defendant) was terminated. The employee successfully grieved his termination as being without just cause. An arbitrator ordered that the employee “should be reinstated with full back pay and benefits.” Between the termination and arbitration award, there were three periods: (1) between November 1995 and May 1996, the employee collected unemployment while searching for a job; (2) between June 1996 and December 1996, the employee attended trainings to receive an extension of unemployment benefits but did not search for a job (additionally, he did not search for a job between May and June because he was not receiving unemployment benefits); and (3) between December 1996 and January 1997, the employee looked for work. Subsequently, the union (plaintiff) and Ralph’s could not agree what amount, if any, the employee was due as back pay. The union argued that the employee was entitled to full back pay and benefits with no reduction for earnings or unemployment compensation. The union also sought $1,000 as punitive damages/interest on the original award. Ralph’s responded that the full amount was not due because the employee failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate his losses. Ralph’s also argued that it should not be responsible for anything beyond back pay and that any back pay should be reduced by the employee’s unemployment benefits. The union responded that the employee took sufficient steps to search for other employment after the initial termination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Prayzich, Arbitrator)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership