Regina v. Stewart
Canada Supreme Court
50 D.L.R.4th 1 (1988)
Wayne John Stewart (defendant) was hired by someone he believed to be acting on behalf of a union which was attempting to organize about 600 employees of the Constellation Hotel in Toronto to obtain the names and addresses of the employees. A hotel policy treated personal employee information as confidential. Stewart offered Hart, a security guard at the hotel, a fee to obtain the information. Instead, Hart reported the offer to his supervisor. Subsequent telephone conversations between Stewart and Hart were recorded and thereafter Stewart was indicted, among other things, for counseling the offense of theft in violation of § 283 of the Criminal Code. Stewart was acquitted by the trial judge, but on appeal the court reversed and entered a guilty verdict. Stewart then appealed to the Canada Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lamer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.