Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County v. LFG, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
460 F.3d 697 (2006)
- Written by Abby Keenan, JD
Facts
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), a private party was entitled to recover costs incurred in a cleanup of contamination by a prior owner, but only if the costs were necessary and consistent with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). Costs were necessary if incurred in response to a threat to human health or the environment. To comply with the NCP, the party must have completed a remedial investigation (RI), a feasibility study (FS), a record of decision (ROD), and an opportunity for public comment. Additionally, Kentucky required a baseline-risk assessment (BRA) if remediation did not include removal of the contamination. The Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County (the authority) (plaintiff) expanded an airport onto contaminated land owned by LFG, LLC, and Navistar International Transportation Corporation (collectively, LFG) (defendants). The authority began the work before obtaining public comments and preparing the RI/FS, and it never completed an ROD. Additionally, the authority departed from the recommendations of the RI/FS and chose not to remove the contamination, and it completed the runway construction before preparing the BRA. Kentucky belatedly approved the RI/FS and BRA. The authority filed a CERCLA action in federal district court to recover cleanup costs. The district court granted summary judgment for LFG, finding that the cleanup was not necessary and not in compliance with the NCP. The authority appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Suhrheinrich, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.