Renne v. Geary

501 U.S. 312 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Renne v. Geary

United States Supreme Court
501 U.S. 312 (1991)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Article II, § 6(b) of the California constitution provided that no political party or committee could endorse, support, or oppose a candidate for a nonpartisan office. Under § 6(a), all judicial, school, county, and city offices were nonpartisan. Members of various political committees (the committee members) (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in federal district court against the city and county of San Francisco and certain local officials (collectively, San Francisco) (defendants), arguing that § 6(b) violated the United States Constitution. The committee members claimed that they and their committees desired to endorse, support, and oppose political candidates for nonpartisan offices but that their fear of violating § 6(b) stopped them from doing so. The committee members also alleged that San Francisco had a policy of deleting committee endorsements from candidate statements, which the committee members claimed violated their right to receive information related to party endorsements. In 1987, the year that the lawsuit was filed, members of one committee did endorse a candidate for a nonpartisan office, but no enforcement action was taken against them. The district court held that § 6(b) was unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement. The court of appeals affirmed the district court. San Francisco appealed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. During oral arguments, questions arose about whether the case was ripe for adjudication.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)

Concurrence (Stevens, J.)

Dissent (Marshall, J.)

Dissent (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership