Reynolds Metal Co. v. United States
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
389 F. Supp. 2d 692 (2005)
- Written by Bradley Marzola, JD
Facts
From 1940 to 1987, Reynolds Metal Company (Reynolds) (plaintiff) properly disposed of waste byproducts in accordance with industry standards and current law. Later, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Reynolds was forced to redispose of its waste and to remediate contaminated areas from its previous years of operation. Reynolds paid more than $110 million from 1992 to 1995 to comply with CERCLA. Reynolds was entitled to deduct the payments for CERCLA as a business expense. However, tax rates were lower from 1992 to 1995 than they had been in the period of 47 years between 1940 and 1987. Reynolds filed suit against the United States government (government) (defendant), seeking a tax refund for an overpayment of taxes from 1940 to 1987. Reynolds argued that it should have been able to deduct its CERCLA payments in those years. Both parties filed motions for partial summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Spencer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.