Reynolds v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Washington
951 P.2d 761 (1998)
Jamie and Anna Hicks (defendants) hosted a wedding reception, where their minor nephew consumed alcohol. The nephew later drove, and was involved in an accident with Reynolds (plaintiff). Reynolds and his family sued the Hicks, alleging that they were negligent in serving alcohol to their nephew, and knew that he was under the legal drinking age and later became intoxicated. The Reynolds argued that the Hick owed them a duty of care, based on a Washington statute which prohibits the supply of alcohol to persons under 21. The trial court dismissed the Hicks on summary judgment, agreeing that Washington law does not make a social host liable to a third party for injuries sustained as a result of the host providing alcohol to someone under 21. The court of appeals certified the case to this court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Madsen, J.)
Concurrence (Durham, C.J.)
Dissent (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.