Rimmer v. Tesla
Florida District Court of Appeal
201 So. 2d 573 (1967)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Mildred Rimmer and her husband, George Rimmer, decedents, were killed in a car accident on May 1, 1965. Within minutes of the crash, a medical doctor came upon the scene of the accident and examined both George and Mildred. The doctor testified George was already dead by the time he examined him but that Mildred was still breathing and had a pulse. Mildred survived for approximately an additional 15 minutes. Both George and Mildred were deceased by the time the ambulance arrived. The death certificates for both Mildred and George listed the time of death as approximately 9:00 a.m. on May 1, 1965. George and Mildred owned real property and numerous bank accounts, all held in joint title with right of survivorship. Marina Tesla (defendant), as administrator of Mildred’s estate, argued that (1) Mildred and George had not died simultaneously as defined in the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act; (2) Mildred was George’s surviving spouse and inherited full title to all joint assets upon George’s death; and (3) therefore, all formerly joint assets were part of Mildred’s estate for probate purposes. Frank Rimmer (plaintiff), as administrator for George’s estate, countered, arguing that the death certificates were prima facie evidence that Mildred and George had died simultaneously and that their respective estates should therefore equally share in all joint assets. The trial court held that George had predeceased Mildred and that all joint assets were part of Mildred’s estate. Frank appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wigginton, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.