Robinson v. Wangemann

75 F.2d 756 (1935)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Robinson v. Wangemann

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
75 F.2d 756 (1935)

Facts

In 1922, Arthur Wangemann, the president of Wangemann-Reichardt Company (W-R Co.), sold 500 shares of W-R Co. stock back to W-R Co. Pursuant to a promissory note, Wangemann was to be paid $55,000 plus interest on or before January 1, 1923. At the time of the transaction, W-R Co. was solvent and had sufficient funds to pay Wangemann in cash without becoming insolvent. The note to Wangemann was not paid on its due date, however. Over time, renewal notes were issued and the amount owed to Wangemann was reduced. W-R Co. eventually changed its name to Reichardt-Abbott Company, Inc. (R-A Co.) and entered into bankruptcy proceedings. By that point, R-A Co. had insufficient assets to pay its creditors in full. Several notes to Wangemann, including a $30,000 note due in January 1933 and four notes covering interest payments, were still outstanding. Since Wangemann had passed away, his executrix (plaintiff) filed a claim in the bankruptcy court on behalf of Wangemann’s estate, requesting to participate in the distribution of R-A Co. assets equally with other creditors. The bankruptcy referee allowed the executrix’s claim on the grounds that the transaction between Wangemann and W-R Co. had been made in good faith and would have stood had Wangemann been timely paid. The referee’s order was affirmed; that decision was appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Foster, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership