Roco v. Commissioner

121 T.C. 160 (2003)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Roco v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
121 T.C. 160 (2003)

RW
Play video

Facts

Under the False Claims Act and as the United States government’s relator, Roco (plaintiff) brought a qui tam action against a medical center, alleging that the medical center had used false information to obtain an overpayment of government funds. Roco’s suit was based on his personal knowledge as a former accountant for the medical center. In 1997, to settle the action, the medical center repaid $15.5 million to the government, and approximately $1.7 million of this amount was paid to Roco as his reward. The reward stipulated that it did not affect any claim the government might have against Roco, and did not result from any obligation that the government had to Roco. Roco’s wife, a state income-tax auditor, told him that the reward probably was not taxable. However, an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent advised Roco that if he persisted in requesting a letter ruling to that effect, the IRS probably would say that the reward was taxable. Roco withdrew his request for the letter ruling, but in his 1997 tax return, he did not list the reward as income and therefore paid no tax on it. The commissioner of the IRS (defendant) issued a deficiency notice accordingly. Roco filed a petition challenging the deficiency determination, claiming that treating qui tam rewards as taxable gross income could discourage private persons from acting as relators, and that his reward was not gain derived from capital or labor.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Colvin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 735,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership