Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Rodgers v. St. Mary’s Hospital

Supreme Court of Illinois
597 N.E.2d 616 (1992)


Facts

In May 1986, Rodgers (plaintiff) sued his wife’s obstetricians, radiologists, and St. Mary’s Hospital (the hospital) (defendant), alleging their medical malpractice caused her wrongful death. Rodgers claimed his wife’s condition was apparent in an X-ray, but the X-ray was lost before trial. Summary judgment was granted to the hospital. After trial, in June 1988, the jury awarded $1.2 million in damages from the obstetricians, but concluded the radiologists were not liable. The obstetricians appealed but later settled for $800,000. While that case had been pending, Rodgers sued the hospital in a separate lawsuit in September 1987 for its failure to preserve his wife’s X-rays for five years, as required by state law. Rodgers argued the hospital’s breach of its statutory duty resulted in loss of evidence essential to his claim against the radiologists. Rodgers contended that had the radiologists been found liable, the original $1.2 million verdict would never have been appealed. Thus, Rodgers sought the $400,000 difference between that and the settlement. The trial court dismissed. Rodgers appealed, and the appellate court reversed, holding that Rodgers’s statutory claim had not been waived or barred by res judicata. The hospital appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.