Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Rodríguez v. Señor Frog’s de La Isla, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
642 F.3d 28 (2011)


Facts

Paloma Rodríguez (plaintiff) was driving in Puerto Rico when her car broke down. She moved to the shoulder, out of the line of traffic. Carlos Estrada, intoxicated and speeding in a vehicle registered to Señor Frog’s de La Isla, Inc. (Señor Frog’s) (defendant), plowed into Rodríguez’s car, causing her serious injury. Nine months after the accident, Rodríguez moved from Puerto Rico to California. Three months later, she sued Señor Frog’s in Puerto Rico’s federal district court pursuant to its diversity jurisdiction. By the time Rodríguez filed her complaint, she had moved all of her belongings to California; opened a California bank account; and obtained a California driver’s license, cell phone number, and job. Soon thereafter, Rodríguez gave birth to a son in California and began taking classes at a local college. A year or so later, Rodríguez enrolled at a university in Puerto Rico for several semesters. Rodríguez returned to California during school breaks, however, and intended to stay there permanently. Señor Frog’s challenged Rodríguez’s claim of California citizenship, pointing out that she never registered to vote or attended church in California and that she had made a statement about having lived her entire life in Puerto Rico a few weeks after the accident. After a hearing on jurisdiction in which Rodríguez testified as the sole witness and presented no documentary evidence, the district court concluded that the parties were diverse. A jury rendered a $450,000 verdict for Rodríguez. Señor Frog’s appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.