Rosario v. Holder

627 F.3d 58 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rosario v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
627 F.3d 58 (2010)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1994, Josefa Rosario (plaintiff), a Dominican Republic citizen, obtained a one-month nonimmigrant tourist visa to come to the United States. Rosario remained in the country after the visa expired. In 1996, Rosario married Pedro Martinez, who was a US citizen. Rosario applied to receive Legal Permanent Resident status. The application was denied in 2000 because Rosario took no further action after filing the application. In 2002, Rosario was charged with removal. In response, Rosario claimed that she was subject to extreme cruelty and that therefore Attorney General Eric Holder (defendant) had discretion to cancel her removal. Rosario alleged that she had been physically and verbally abused by Martinez on five different occasions. However, the immigration judge (IJ) found that Rosario had not suffered extreme cruelty and denied the petition. Rosario appealed. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed. Rosario appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership