Rush v. Johnson

565 F. Supp. 856 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rush v. Johnson

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
565 F. Supp. 856 (1983)

Facts

In 1974, Carolyn Rush (plaintiff) applied to the Georgia Department of Medical Assistance (Georgia) (defendant) to cover the cost of sex-reassignment surgery under the state’s Medicaid program. Rush’s request was denied because it was determined that Rush did not suffer from a pathological condition and that sex-reassignment surgery was not covered under Georgia’s Medicaid coverage, because it was an experimental surgery. Rush sued Georgia, asking the court for an injunction against the denial of her application and damages. The district court granted Rush summary judgment, but the court of appeals reversed the decision and remanded the case back to the court. The parties each presented expert testimony regarding the efficacy and recognition of sex-reassignment surgery in the medical community. The expert testimonies conflicted over the safety and efficacy of transsexual surgery and the degree to which sex-reassignment surgery was recognized as a proven treatment for the condition of transsexualism in the medical community. Some evidence suggested that there was growing concern in the medical literature over the long-term effectiveness of sex-reassignment surgery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Freeman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership